<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Slapping Review Sites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contentgeneration.org/google-slapping-review-sites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contentgeneration.org/google-slapping-review-sites/</link>
	<description>Blackhat SEO Tips, Tactics &#038; Articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 15:07:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0-beta1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.contentgeneration.org/google-slapping-review-sites/#comment-1637</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 02:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentgeneration.org/google-slapping-review-sites/#comment-1637</guid>
		<description>This is by far the worst &lt;a href=&quot;”http://www.therealtimscott.com/i-am-google-hear-me-roar/&quot;&gt;Google slap&lt;/a&gt; I have ever seen. It&#039;s not just review sites getting shut down. All affliate marketers are getting baned and even some legit brick and mortar business.

I mean seriuosly, WTF? They have literally shut down thousand of people sole source of income. Do no evil my ass, they need a new moto, IMO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is by far the worst <a href="”http://www.therealtimscott.com/i-am-google-hear-me-roar/">Google slap</a> I have ever seen. It&#8217;s not just review sites getting shut down. All affliate marketers are getting baned and even some legit brick and mortar business.</p>
<p>I mean seriuosly, WTF? They have literally shut down thousand of people sole source of income. Do no evil my ass, they need a new moto, IMO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lex</title>
		<link>http://www.contentgeneration.org/google-slapping-review-sites/#comment-1369</link>
		<dc:creator>Lex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 20:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentgeneration.org/google-slapping-review-sites/#comment-1369</guid>
		<description>Is there any indicator of how many aff links a page / site needs to get slapped?   There must be all kinds of &quot;legitimate&quot; content which is monetized through aff schemes (everyone&#039;s gotta pay the bills somehow, even the people making &quot;really useful&quot; sites) - just cos a page has an aff link on it, doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s &quot;low content quality&quot;.

Apart from SE link cloaking, wondering if having less affiliate links per page would help - bigger sites with more review content and bigger product images.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any indicator of how many aff links a page / site needs to get slapped?   There must be all kinds of &#8220;legitimate&#8221; content which is monetized through aff schemes (everyone&#8217;s gotta pay the bills somehow, even the people making &#8220;really useful&#8221; sites) &#8211; just cos a page has an aff link on it, doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s &#8220;low content quality&#8221;.</p>
<p>Apart from SE link cloaking, wondering if having less affiliate links per page would help &#8211; bigger sites with more review content and bigger product images.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.contentgeneration.org/google-slapping-review-sites/#comment-1268</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 20:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentgeneration.org/google-slapping-review-sites/#comment-1268</guid>
		<description>Aren&#039;t the Fed&#039;s getting involved in &quot;review&quot; sites to crack down as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t the Fed&#8217;s getting involved in &#8220;review&#8221; sites to crack down as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert</title>
		<link>http://www.contentgeneration.org/google-slapping-review-sites/#comment-1267</link>
		<dc:creator>robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentgeneration.org/google-slapping-review-sites/#comment-1267</guid>
		<description>My review sites are ppc atm but they are html subpages with a WP front-end. I anly use WP for quality but I suppose that I could attempt to SEO optimize those sites as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My review sites are ppc atm but they are html subpages with a WP front-end. I anly use WP for quality but I suppose that I could attempt to SEO optimize those sites as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.contentgeneration.org/google-slapping-review-sites/#comment-1236</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 21:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentgeneration.org/google-slapping-review-sites/#comment-1236</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Edward: I said 20+ (25/30/35 whatever)... I&#039;ve been studying review sites for a while now and have built some of my own - they are magic when done well! Goto http://flippa.com/ and search for affiliate review sites, you&#039;ll find MANY generating $500 to over $1000 a month, now times this by 20+ and you&#039;ll see the potential!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I believe if you combine good product-review sites with a very aggressive SEO strategy, you can be heading towards that figure, as passive income, within 6 to 12 months.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Edward: I said 20+ (25/30/35 whatever)&#8230; I&#8217;ve been studying review sites for a while now and have built some of my own &#8211; they are magic when done well! Goto <a href="http://flippa.com/" >http://flippa.com/</a> and search for affiliate review sites, you&#8217;ll find MANY generating $500 to over $1000 a month, now times this by 20+ and you&#8217;ll see the potential!</p>
<p>I believe if you combine good product-review sites with a very aggressive SEO strategy, you can be heading towards that figure, as passive income, within 6 to 12 months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://www.contentgeneration.org/google-slapping-review-sites/#comment-1235</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 21:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentgeneration.org/google-slapping-review-sites/#comment-1235</guid>
		<description>I highly doubt you can get 250,000 of passive income out of 20 review sites, even before the google slap, and even if you cookie stuff them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I highly doubt you can get 250,000 of passive income out of 20 review sites, even before the google slap, and even if you cookie stuff them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trader</title>
		<link>http://www.contentgeneration.org/google-slapping-review-sites/#comment-1234</link>
		<dc:creator>Trader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contentgeneration.org/google-slapping-review-sites/#comment-1234</guid>
		<description>I saw discussions also here 
blog.seorevolution.com/2009/07/27/google-slap-of-affiliate-review-sites and there affilorama.com/blog/google-slap . This is just buzz and speculation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw discussions also here<br />
blog.seorevolution.com/2009/07/27/google-slap-of-affiliate-review-sites and there affilorama.com/blog/google-slap . This is just buzz and speculation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

