Comments on: Whitehat MFAs

By: Dave Simpson

Dave Simpson — Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:15:22 +0000

What about autoblogs using content generators like caffeinated content – wouldnt that wotk just as well?

By: Tom Cruse

Tom Cruse — Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:45:22 +0000

The link :http://www.sharebigfile.com/file/208343/mortgage-xml.html

Has stopped working.

Can u repost ?

By: transflux

transflux — Fri, 07 Dec 2007 13:28:16 +0000

instead of monetizing your MFA sites right away focus and aggregate link strength on another tier and get better value for the clicks

By: Braindead

Braindead — Fri, 07 Sep 2007 08:22:14 +0000

I’d like to know how much traffic do you get daily with one of those WH MFAs website and how do you get those traffics, with ordinary WH or BH method?

By: Whitehat... - Web [ Ectio.us ]

Whitehat... - Web [ Ectio.us ] — Thu, 06 Sep 2007 23:42:19 +0000

[...] From contentgeneration.org [...]

By: Brad

Brad — Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:20:50 +0000

Yes! They’re called MFAs, because they are created with Adsense in mind. However, including affiliate links/banners in the content/sidebars is obviously desirable to maximize revenue potential.

Again, yes! WP MU is great. I have a future post about WP MU, cloaking, and a landing page… much more profitable than typical MFAs! But that is another day.

By: More Recipes

More Recipes — Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:09:40 +0000

A couple of more questions; thanks for your indulgence. Wouldn’t it make more sense to monetize such sites with affiliate offers(not that I know from experience)? And, if hosted on a bunch of subdomains, would something like WordPress MU be in order?

By: Brad

Brad — Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:40:39 +0000

Either.

By: Recipe Guy

Recipe Guy — Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:34:30 +0000

Would a tactic like this require separate domains for each blog, or would subdomains work ok?